Governance Architecture
Whether accountability is clearly defined, documented, and understood, not just assumed.
Board Advisory
Could Your Board Defend Its Governance Record Today?
Receiving a cyber report is not governance. This review examines whether your board can demonstrate, to a regulator, an auditor, or a court, that it actively understood, challenged, and acted on what it was told.
Enquire About This ReviewFixed fee: $15,000 AUD
All engagements conducted under strict non-disclosure.
A board that receives regular cyber reporting and wants an independent assessment of whether that reporting is actually enabling governance, or providing comfort without substance.
A board that has experienced an incident, received a regulatory inquiry, or is preparing for an audit and wants to understand its governance position honestly before someone else assesses it.
A board in a regulated sector (APRA-regulated, health, or critical infrastructure) where the board's accountability for information security is explicit in legislation.
A chair or risk committee chair who wants to know, with confidence, whether the board's current oversight record would hold up.
"If a material cyber breach occurred tomorrow and ASIC reviewed your board's conduct over the past 12 months: what would they find?"
This review answers that question before you have to.
Whether accountability is clearly defined, documented, and understood, not just assumed.
Whether the information reaching your board is decision-quality, or technical noise that creates the illusion of oversight.
Where your board's current position sits against ASIC guidance, the Privacy Act, APRA CPS 234, and the SOCI Act.
A formal, confidential report delivered to the Chair or Risk Committee. Structured to be tabled at a board meeting and acted upon immediately.
Rated across six domains, benchmarked against regulatory expectations.
What your current reports tell directors, and what they should.
RACI matrix: current state versus required state.
Specific gaps mapped to specific provisions.
Assessed as High, Medium, or Low, with supporting rationale.
Prioritised, practical, and achievable.
Ready-to-use reporting templates that would satisfy regulatory scrutiny.
Investment
$15,000 AUD
Fixed fee. Conflict-free. Delivered when complete.
Engagements are scoped and commenced upon receipt of a signed engagement letter.
Enquire About This Review